Overview

The Recreation, Parks & Tourism (RPT) undergraduate program was first accredited in 1990 and has been continuously accredited since then.  Most recently the program was re-accredited by Council on Accreditation for Parks, Recreation, Tourism and Related Professions (COARPT) on October 31, 2015.  Since this accreditation, the department is required to adhere to a revised set of COARPT standards.  The RPT Department has made significant progress since the last reaccreditation towards meeting the new standards. Under the current COAPRT accreditation requirements, standard 2.05.05 requires reporting of aggregated results of learning outcome assessments.  Results for the most recent academic year (AY 2017-2018) are posted below.

Please watch this important video regarding degree and accreditation mills. According to CHEA, “Degree mills and accreditation mills mislead and harm. In the United States, degrees and certificates from mills may not be acknowledged by other institutions when students seek to transfer or go to graduate school. Employers may not acknowledge degrees and certificates from degree mills when providing tuition assistance for continuing education. ‘Accreditation’ from an accreditation mill can mislead students and the public about the quality of an institution. In the presence of degree mills and accreditation mills, students may spend a good deal of money and receive neither an education nor a useable credential.” Read more on CHEA’s website.

Council on Accreditation of Recreation, Parks, Tourism and Related Professions (COAPRT)

• 2023 Annual Report
• 2022 Annual Report
• 2021 Annual Report

Annual Assessment Data for 7.0 Accreditation Standards

Two direct measures (pretest/posttest, and signature assignment) are used to assess students’ knowledge of accreditation standards 7.01 through 7.04 and associated student learning outcomes. See each standard below for details related to content, Student Learning Outcomes (SLO), and assessments.

Direct Measure #1 – a pretest/posttest consists of 8-12 questions (T/F, Multiple Choice, Matching, Open-ended) based on the standard’s SLOs, which are often the exact SLO wording. For example:

• SLO: Students will be able to compare and contrast the concepts of play, leisure, and recreation.
• Assessment question: Compare and contrast the concepts of play, leisure, and recreation.  

The pretest is administered to the entire class (range = 33-52 students) during the first two weeks of class and the posttest is given during the last two weeks of class. The average score (Mean) across all students is recorded for each academic year. Evidence of student learning was defined as a posttest average/mean score that is significantly higher than the pretest average/mean score.  

Direct Measure #2 – a signature assignment is used to evaluate student learning in courses associated with the following standards

• Standard 7.01 – Philosophy Paper (RPT 200)
• Standard 7.02 – Program Plan (RPT 400)
• Standard 7.03 – Budget Analysis (RPT 500)
• Standard 7.04 – Internship Project (RPT 690)

The signature assignment is required of all students (#) and is assessed using a 0 to 100-point grading rubric (see associated class syllabus for rubric). The average score (Ave %) across all students is recorded each academic year. Evidence of student learning was defined as an average score of 83/100 (83%) with a range between 70 to 100.

COAPRT Standard 7.01

Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate the following entry-level knowledge: a) the nature and scope of the relevant park, recreation, tourism or related professions and their associated industries; b) techniques and processes used by professionals and workers in these industries; and c) the foundation of the profession in history, science and philosophy.

RPT 200 – Foundations of Recreation, Parks & Tourism

Student Learning Outcomes

Concepts & Philosophy 

1. Compare and contrast concepts of play, leisure, and recreation. 
2. Explain how parks and tourism are integral to the leisure experience. 
3. Identify philosophical perspectives of leisure and explain their implications to the RPT profession. 

History 

1. Identify and explain how significant events (in and outside western civilization) shaped RPT. 
2. Identify and explain how significant individuals (including women and people of color) shaped RPT. 

Science 

1. Identify theories that support RPT as a discipline. 
2. Justify RPT as a social and behavioral science.                      

¹ – Pretest: 10-12 questions
² – Posttest: 10-12 questions
³ – Assignment: Philosophy Paper

Standard 7.02

Students graduating from the program shall be able to demonstrate the ability to design, implement, and evaluate services that facilitate targeted human experiences and that embrace personal and cultural dimensions of diversity.

RPT 400 – Programming Recreation, Parks & Tourism Experiences

Student Learning Outcomes

Engineer/Plan 

1. Perform a needs assessment and generate an asset map.
2. Develop a program budget. 

Engage/Implement

1. Create a marketing and risk management plan.
2. Engineer a 1-day experience as part of a larger program. 

Evaluate

1. Differentiate evaluation methods.
2. Collect and analyze data, report results, and provide recommendations.                       

¹ – Pretest: 10-12 questions
² – Posttest: 10-12 questions
³ – Assignment: Program Plan (including marketing, budget, risk management, assessment, evaluation)

COAPRT Standard 7.03

Students graduating from the program shall be able to demonstrate entry-level knowledge about operations and strategic management/administration in parks, recreation, tourism and/or related professions.

RPT 500 – Organization and Administration of Recreation, Parks & Tourism

Student Learning Outcomes

Finance

1. Analyze the revenue sources of a for-profit, nonprofit, and public RPT organization.
2. Differentiate between capital and operating budgets.
3. Develop and revise an operating budget for an RPT organization. 

Human Capital 

1. Evaluate the supervisory role at different levels in a RPT organization.
2. Explain recruitment and retention practices and processes.
3. Analyze appropriate ways of motivating and disciplining employees 

Organizational Structure

1. Identify elements of organizational structure.
2. Explain the importance of and differentiate between vision, mission, and values.
3. Explain the elements of a strategic plan                 

¹ – Pretest: 10-12 questions
² – Posttest: 10-12 questions
³ – Assignment: Budget Analysis

COAPRT Standard 7.04

Students graduating from the program shall demonstrate, through a comprehensive internship of not less than 400 clock hours and no fewer than 10 weeks, the potential to succeed as professionals at supervisory or higher levels in park, recreation, tourism, or related organizations.

RPT 690 – Internship in Recreation, Parks & Tourism

Student Learning Outcomes

1. Integrate theory and practice by applying concepts, principles, and best practices to the assessment, design, implementation, and evaluation of a product, program, event, activity, and/or service.
2. Demonstrate professionalism through intrapersonal and interpersonal communication (e.g., professional, verbal, nonverbal), critical thinking, and a positive work ethic.
3. Explain how the organization operates and its relationship with stakeholders, constituents, and the recreation, parks, and tourism profession and industry.
4. Plan, organize, implement, and evaluate a project approved and supervised by the organization.
5. Demonstrate proficiency with utilizing a variety of technology and computer software programs (e.g., social media, word processing, database/spreadsheet, publishing, reservation and/or permit system).
6. Exhibit knowledge and basic competency in marketing, budgeting, and facility operations.
7. Identify, examine, and analyze trends and issues within the recreation, parks, and tourism profession.
8. Reflect on the importance of an internship as a culminating experience, and the connection between quality of life and the recreation, parks, and tourism profession and industry.                  

¹ – Midterm Evaluation: 6 competencies and an overall 1-5 score with 1 being “poor” to 5 being “Outstanding”
² – Final Evaluation: 6 competencies and an overall 1-5 score with 1 being “poor” to 5 being “Outstanding”
³ – Assignment: Internship Project